Modèle:Cite check/doc : Différence entre versions

Version actuelle datée du 21 octobre 2017 à 20:58

{{#ifeq:doc |doc

{{#ifeq:show |show

|

This is a documentation subpage for Modèle:Cite check.
It contains usage information, categories and other content that is not part of the original {{#if: |{{{text2}}} |{{#if: |{{{text1}}} |{{#ifeq:Modèle |Utilisateur |modèle template page |{{#if:Modèle |modèle page|article}}}}}}}}.

        }}{{#if: |
         |   {{#ifexist:Modèle:Cite check
                  | [[Category:{{#switch:Modèle |Template=Template |Module=Module |User=User |#default=Wikipedia}} documentation pages]]
                  |
                 }}
        }}
    | 
   }}

Place this template at the top of the article or section tagged.

The simplest way to add this template to an article is to copy and paste {{{{#if: |subst:}}Cite check{{#if:date=mai 2024 ||date=mai 2024}}{{#if: ||{{{3}}}}}{{#if: ||{{{4}}}}}{{#if: ||{{{5}}}}}{{#if: ||{{{6}}}}}{{#if: ||{{{7}}}}}{{#if: ||{{{8}}}}}{{#if: ||{{{9}}}}}{{#if: ||{{{10}}}}}{{#if: ||{{{11}}}}}{{#if: ||…}}}} at the top of the article.

This template will categorise tagged articles into Category:All articles lacking reliable references and either Category:Articles lacking reliable references or a monthly category like Category:Articles lacking reliable references from mai 2024, if a date is supplied.

This template is a self-reference.
Please do not subst: this template.

Usage

This template alerts readers that citations in an article or section may be inappropriate or misinterpreted. Examples include quotations taken out of context and false assertions about a source's facts or conclusions.

When using this template the text should have:

Citations in footnote, Harvard referencing, or some other standard format.
Multiple citations (or one key citation) that an editor tried to verify and found that the article passage misstated or misconstrued the original source's content.

Please try to improve the article or make a good faith attempt to verify the citations in question before adding this template, and discuss the matter on the talk page. If only one citation is problematic, or there is a desire to tag particular citations, consider using {{failed verification}} instead.

Articles that merely lack references or have POV problems should be flagged with some other template.

Additional options

This template has three optional fields.

The first permits the user to specify what needs to be cited. For instance, if the entire article needs to be cited, a user would enter {{{{#if: |subst:}}cite check{{#if:article ||article}}{{#if: ||{{{3}}}}}{{#if: ||{{{4}}}}}{{#if: ||{{{5}}}}}{{#if: ||{{{6}}}}}{{#if: ||{{{7}}}}}{{#if: ||{{{8}}}}}{{#if: ||{{{9}}}}}{{#if: ||{{{10}}}}}{{#if: ||{{{11}}}}}{{#if: ||…}}}}; but should the user wish to be more specific on which section of the article needs to be cited, then the user could enter {{{{#if: |subst:}}cite check{{#if:section called "Childhood" ||section called "Childhood"}}{{#if: ||{{{3}}}}}{{#if: ||{{{4}}}}}{{#if: ||{{{5}}}}}{{#if: ||{{{6}}}}}{{#if: ||{{{7}}}}}{{#if: ||{{{8}}}}}{{#if: ||{{{9}}}}}{{#if: ||{{{10}}}}}{{#if: ||{{{11}}}}}{{#if: ||…}}}}. Leaving the parameter undefined is acceptable, as it will print out the default text "article or section."

The second field is a date parameter, entered as "date=month year". Adding this sorts the article into subcategories of Category:Articles lacking sources, allowing the oldest problems to be identified and dealt with first. If the date parameter is omitted, a bot will add it later.

Note that order does not matter with respect to the above optional parameters. Both {{{{#if: |subst:}}Cite check{{#if:section ||section}}{{#if:date=mai 2024 ||date=mai 2024}}{{#if: ||{{{4}}}}}{{#if: ||{{{5}}}}}{{#if: ||{{{6}}}}}{{#if: ||{{{7}}}}}{{#if: ||{{{8}}}}}{{#if: ||{{{9}}}}}{{#if: ||{{{10}}}}}{{#if: ||{{{11}}}}}{{#if: ||…}}}} and {{{{#if: |subst:}}cite check{{#if:date=mai 2024 ||date=mai 2024}}{{#if:section ||section}}{{#if: ||{{{4}}}}}{{#if: ||{{{5}}}}}{{#if: ||{{{6}}}}}{{#if: ||{{{7}}}}}{{#if: ||{{{8}}}}}{{#if: ||{{{9}}}}}{{#if: ||{{{10}}}}}{{#if: ||{{{11}}}}}{{#if: ||…}}}} will produce the same result.

To specify a talk page section, use talk=talk page section, e.g. {{{{#if: |subst:}}Cite check{{#if:article ||article}}{{#if:talk=Some section on talk page ||talk=Some section on talk page}}{{#if: ||{{{4}}}}}{{#if: ||{{{5}}}}}{{#if: ||{{{6}}}}}{{#if: ||{{{7}}}}}{{#if: ||{{{8}}}}}{{#if: ||{{{9}}}}}{{#if: ||{{{10}}}}}{{#if: ||{{{11}}}}}{{#if: ||…}}}}.

Template data

<templatedata> { "params": { "talk": { "label": "Talk page section", "description": "Used specify a talk page section where a discussion is taking place regarding possible inappropriate or misinterpreted citations.", "type": "string" }, "date": { "label": "Date", "description": "The month and year this banner was placed.", "example": "February 2017", "type": "date", "suggested": true } }, "description": "Used for articles possibly containing inappropriate or misinterpreted citations that do not verify the text. ", "paramOrder": [ "date", "talk" ], "format": "inline" } </templatedata>

Redirects

{{Cite-check}}
{{Citecheck}}

v t e Citation and verifiability article maintenance templates
Sourcing	{{Better source}} {{Category unsourced}} {{Uncited category}} {{Circular}} {{Excessive citations}} {{Further reading cleanup}} {{More footnotes}} {{No footnotes}} {{One source}} {{One source section}} {{NRIS-only}} {{Partisan sources}} {{Primary sources}} {{Refimprove}} {{Refimprove section}} {{Refexample}} {{Religious text primary}} {{Self-published}} {{Third-party}} {{Unreferenced}} {{Unreferenced section}} {{Unreliable sources}}
BLP specific	{{BLP unsourced}} {{BLP unsourced section}} {{BLP primary sources}} {{BLP self-published}} {{BLP sources}} {{BLP sources section}} {{BLP IMDb-only refimprove}} {{BLP IMDb refimprove}} {{BLP no footnotes}} {{BLP more footnotes}}
Topic specific	{{Film IMDb refimprove}} {{Local}} {{Medref}} {{Neologism}} {{Refimprove science}} {{Science review}} {{Unreferenced-law}} {{Unreferenced-law section}} {{Unreferenced-medical section}}
Dispute related	{{Cite check}} {{Disputed}} {{Dispute about}} {{Disputed section}} {{Original research}} {{Original research section}} {{Speculation}} {{Speculation section}} {{Synthesis}} {{Verifiability}} {{Verify sources}}
Citation improvements	{{Bad linked references}} {{Citation style}} {{Citations broken}} {{Cleanup bare URLs}} {{Format footnotes}} {{Ibid}} {{Page numbers improve}} {{Page numbers needed}} {{Time references needed}} {{Unlinked references}}

Modèle:Cite check/doc : Différence entre versions

Version actuelle datée du 21 octobre 2017 à 20:58

Sommaire

Usage

Additional options

Template data

Redirects

See also

Menu de navigation

Outils personnels

Espaces de noms

Variantes

Affichages

Plus

Rechercher

Navigation

Pages

Outils

Version du 11 mars 2017 à 19:53 (voir la source) Daylen (discussion) m (→‎Template data)	Version actuelle datée du 21 octobre 2017 à 20:58 (voir la source) TDLaouer (discussion \| contributions) m (1 révision importée)
(Aucune différence)